All posts by paulrobertburton

Final Letter To The DPP concerning removal of “The Child”

29/01/2018

Dear Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions, (DPP)

I refer to your letter dated the 18th January 2018 where I had on the 5th January asked for identification of the Officers of the Dept of Family and Community Services (FACS) and the NSW Police Force who were in attendance at The Church Of Ubuntu on the 19th May 2017. I also refer to my request for you to provide information on what dutiful authority could help me find out the information that you and all the other Government departments have now refused to give.

I reference your following statement from that letter on the 18th January 2018.

“ It is not the role of my office to provide you with the advice you requested in your letter. No advice of that kind will be provided to you in relation to this matter.”

I find it absolutely astounding that employees of the State of NSW can act corruptly and illegally seize children for unlawful reasons, and rather than the DPP dealing with them in an appropriate manner, you prefer to circle the wagons and protect them.

A Former NSW Premier Mr Baird stated that the Dept of Family and Community Services (FACS) were beyond repair and needed to be dismantled. Former AMA president and Sydney deputy Lord Mayor Dr Phelps stated that the Dept should be dismantled and the Act of parliament shredded. This Dept is completely out of control and it appears to be run by people who continually hide in the shadows. So called not for profit organisations channel money in the millions through around forty companies to two individuals and not a word is said.

“Risk of Significant Harm” is inserted into the Act of Parliament thereby virtually allowing any child to be taken, even if that child is a part of a caring and nurturing home. Under Section 43 of The Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 Family and Community Services (FACS) can, without a warrant, seize a child if they believe he or she is at an immediate risk of serious harm. The Supreme Court of New South Wales ruled that it must be an unacceptable risk, and yet FACS continues to fly in the face of this and take children on fabricated and or completely frivolous grounds. I would go even further to say that they lie outright and will on occasion even act on advice and information provided to them by mentally unstable vindictive people, or information just obtained from the internet, with absolutely no discretion, they simply just make things up and steal children.

Across this State and indeed this country, families are being decimated for profit. Once in the “care” of the State, children never recover, their bonds are broken and their outcomes are poor. In the USA it is estimated that 75% of all the homeless went through the foster care system, the same would apply here.

In effect this is an industry that thrives and grows on removing children who then become cradle to the grave fodder, for a privatised prison system a state run mental health system and all of this done behind the closed doors of the Australian Children’s Courts.

The Crown Solicitors office, the DPP as well as all the professionals and so called Politicians who remain completely silent are in my view complicit in the destruction of families for profit, for there is a time as we all know, when silence becomes betrayal.

What kind of society have we become when a child is taken without a warrant, with absolutely no judicial oversight, without the police identifying themselves, without the FACS caseworkers identifying themselves, a simple question is asked by an innocent victim as to who these people were, and every single Government department just arrogantly refuses to answer, shame on you all.

It is interesting that the Government fears terrorism, when in truth it appears they are the terrorists who think nothing of terrorising decent families.

When FACS takes a child that child never comes home. Why? Because the caseworkers lie and fabricate evidence and they are backed by State paid lawyers who defend them to the hilt. The child is a veritable nothing and the parents, family and community do not even get a look in.

Now that all pregnant women in the State must undergo a mental health assessment, we will most certainly see more children taken to fund the jobs of those that survive and prosper through this lucrative and completely demonic system.

Children die in care and FACS uses State funds to sue people to silence them, so the truth can be hidden. The fact that children face much greater risks of harm in their so called “care” than at home with loved ones, seems to be lost on all who are blinded by their financial rewards.

You say you do not condone violence. That may or may not be so. What is certain though, is that you most certainly seem to be happy to assist in the cover up of the crimes of the FACS workers and others that do.

You refuse to name them so action cannot be taken. When action is taken, you close that down using your legislative powers within a week or so of being requested, you do this by enlisting the services of your associates in the Crown Solicitors office.

You then glibly claim no doubt that this isn’t corrupt behaviour, In my view it is. FACS supported by Government lawyers seek to silence anyone who speaks out, and when that seems to be faltering, they get their colleagues in the Police Force to lay charges. All this is done to protect those who destroy families and the lives of the vulnerable, it is all done using Australian taxpayers money, and yes it is most certainly all about the money, money, money.

You say you do not condone violence, yet you seem happy to be a part of a corrupt system that makes it clear that you do condone violence. It is violent behaviour to use force and threats to coerce families, to seize their children and remove them from their lives, if this is not terrorism then what is?

Not being happy to simply seize the children, they now want to forcibly adopt them out as soon as they can. When one looks at the filth being taught in the “safe schools” program, this all-pervasive mass mental illness of supporting the ridiculous idea that gender is not biological, and all the perversions that go with this. Along with the synchronous Internet sale of some of these same children, stripped off their kind nurturing loving parents. It becomes apparent that this web of deceit, that you as the DPP and the Crown Solicitor support and protect, goes very deep indeed as we sink further and further down the “Rabbit Hole”.

 “At Common Law, a person is entitled to use all force that is reasonable in the circumstances, up to and including lethal force, if they or their family and community are threatened or attacked. They understand that when they believe any person or corporeal entity is acting unlawfully, they will, if necessary, use all reasonable force, up to and including lethal force, to defend themselves, their families, their community and all those that they Love.”

If civil unrest happens as a result of this unlawful and immoral destruction of families, and destroying of children by corrupt departments of the State, then it will be people like you who will be responsible not us. We are defending our young and I have made our position very clear to all of you, and for very good reasons.

Let us hope and pray before it gets to that stage, that at least one Judge will see this filthy industry for what it is, and that they will use their power for good and are able to correct a disgraceful, immoral and corrupt system.

We say nothing when the Government taxes us into oblivion, we say nothing when they spin yarns about Coal and Gas shortages, we say nothing when they restrict our God given rights. We say nothing when the hordes of politicians and govt employees thrust their snouts deeper and deeper into the trough of greed, while the ordinary person slips further into financial destruction and the homeless sleep in the gutters whilst this thing called a Government feasts on their sick ill gotten bounty. We say nothing when they afflict us with unjust laws which Sir Edward Coke, the very founder of Common Law states are no laws at all. Let us no forget these same sentiments echoed in the great words and footsteps of inspired souls like Martin Luther King Junior, Gandhi Ji, John F Kennedy and John Lennon.

We refuse to be silent when you assist those that steal our children to fund an industry and destroy our community in the process. You are the terrorists, you claim you do not condone violence and yet you are the absolute masters at it, this society worships violence and worships war, look around you and open your eyes.

No matter how much evidence can be shown of corrupt behaviour, you just shut the door on any action and protect the guilty. A former heroin trafficker runs a dept that steals children and yet they steal children off casual pot smokers or those that use medicinal cannabis. Known members of the DPP sources recreational cannabis off the black market and others in the DPP source medicinal cannabis for their families while at the same time you incarcerate and demonise a man for researching and making medicinal cannabis oils, the hypocrisy beggars belief.

There appears no need to discuss anything further with you, we will lock our gates and doors, batten down the hatches and we will be ready. We will pray for all evil wretched souls, for the greatest concern of all is not what happens in this life, but for what comes for evil wretched souls in the next.

There is a much greater judge than both you and I and I pity anyone that sells their soul to greed and pure evil, for that is all it is, greed and pure evil.

God is real, God is Love and God is Truth and every word I speak here is true. I do not expect a response, you are corrupt and we the people will respond accordingly. If a legal remedy based on the very foundation of our supposed democracy is not forthcoming over the next twelve months then expect back exactly what you have created for it is out of my hands and I did all I could to warn you and avoid this.

Respectfully Paul Robert Burton

“Speak out on behalf of the voiceless, and for the rights of all who are vulnerable.” – Prov 31:8

“There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known”. – Luke 12:2

Download (PDF, 55KB)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trespass Proclamation & Signs

Hello good people everywhere, For your information please find the following link to free downloadable common law trespass signs and a trespass proclamation to protect you from unlawful visits by FACS and other corporal entities. I will soon have these signs available as corflutes but for now feel free to share this link and download and print any version of the trespass signs and the trespass proclamation. I have come to the undeniable conclusion that our government now has no interest in respecting our common law rights and they now abduct children without warrant, right or justification, please place these signs at the front of your property to revoke the implied common law right of entry.  Once these signs are in place you can use any reasonable force up to and including lethal force to stop any intruder that tries to enter your premises without a warrant or any right or justification. These signs and proclamation are an extension of the lock the gate signage to stop the unlawful entry of mining companies and now includes all other corporal entities like FACS whom steal children for profit and other appalling disgraceful immoral reasons.

respectfully Paul Robert Burton

https://www.paulrobertburton.com/trespass-proclamation-signs/

“At Common Law, a person is entitled to use all force that is reasonable in the circumstances, up to and including lethal force, if they or their family and community are threatened or attacked. They understand that when they believe any person or corporeal entity is acting unlawfully, they will, if necessary, use all reasonable force, up to and including lethal force, to defend themselves, their families, their community and all those that they Love.” – Pr Burton

“And, therefore, when it is said that a man has a thing of common right, it is always to be understood that he has it by the common law. And it is further held, that the common law is called common right, because it is the best and most common birth-right that the subject hath for the safeguard and defence not only of goods, lands, and revenues, but of his wife and children, his body, fame, and life also. An Act of Parliament made against common right, is void and impossible to be performed: for the law is reason and equity to do right to all, and to preserve men from wrong and mischief, and will never make construction against law, equity and right, the rule being legis constructio nunquam facit injuriam.”– Sir Edward Coke

 

20170814 Concerns Notice – The Daily Mail Australia

The following letter is my response to “The Daily Mail” newspaper for their defamatory article about me last friday.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4779114/Mayor-Martin-Place-linked-anti-medicine-cult.html

Interesting that when i am temporarily silenced from speaking truth and risk gaol for wearing a T-Shirt or having a bumper sticker of a child i love whom was abducted over 80 days ago. That newspapers everywhere can defame me and even use images of the child. Why am i in breach for speaking the truth to a few thousand people and why is it fine for a newspaper to spread such defamatory rubbish to 100’s of thousands.

No More Bullshit please you are testing my patience.

much respect xxx PRB

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CONCERNS NOTICE
Defamation Act 2005
The Daily Mail Australia
Att: Yale Brender Journalist
RE: Story in The Daily Mail Australia on 10/08/17
“Mayor of Martin Place’ linked with anti-medicine cult”
Dear Yale,
On the 10/08/17 your paper “The Daily Mail Australia” ran an article that appeared online with the headline “Mayor of Martin Place’ linked with anti-medicine cult”. That article referred to me and made statements that I consider highly defamatory. In point form I refer to the statements made and the imputations they carry.
1) I am referred to as the “public face” of an “anti medicine CULT”
The imputation is that I am a cult figure who is dangerous and who exercises control over people with no concern for their wellbeing.
2) Secondly, you mentioned Dr Andrew Katelaris as a “CULT” leader and chief medical advisor when he is nothing more than an external consultant for our humble wellness clinic. Further to this you included a story about Andrew involving the death of a woman that carries the imputation that I was somehow involved or connected with the death of that woman.
3) Thirdly, the mention of a child being removed from the Church by the Police and welfare officers (which incidentally is in violation of a supreme court non publication order). And by stating that the child is malnourished and neglected, the imputation is carried that I am somehow responsible for this child’s alleged malnourishment and neglect.
4) By referring to us as a health cult, and stating that we have been criticised by the media for endangering children, the imputation is that I am a danger to children. I find this particularly offensive for an individual whom has dedicated his life to helping children in need.
5) By stating that the parents were allowing a deregistered doctor to dose the child with cannabis, carries the imputation that the child was just simply being drugged and that I am a person that condones the drugging of children.
6) By placing the word “Church” in inverted commas it carries the imputation that we are not a real church and suggests that I am “some wacko” with no spiritual foundation or belief in a supreme being. I would also point out that in our constitution it clearly states
“To expound and support the values and teachings of all the recognised faiths.” We help the homeless, we help the sick, we help the disabled, the meek and the humble. We support people in need everywhere we are able. Much of this work is done for free, that is for no pecuniary reward of any kind. We do not indoctrinate or
coerce anyone, I personally do not receive any money for my work with the Church I am the secretary and public officer and a Minister, I exist on “dana”, donations gifted in kind for my selfless dedication to supporting people in need. We are not a “Cult”
7) You have used an image of a child in an online publication with over 830,000 followers, as mentioned above that child is protected by an Australian Supreme court protection order, I cannot currently use that child’s name nor even mention the child in public and yet you associate me with the child to 830,000 people. Although
he is not named over 4 million people know who he is and will recognize his picture and hence associate him with me.
I am very distressed at the story you ran about me directly and by mentioning my name and carrying my photo along with these imputations I believe both myself and “Ubuntu” have been severely and unfairly defamed. Therefore I invite your organisation to make an offer of amends. Without prejudicing future legal actions, I suggest that any offer of amends must include,
A) A full retraction in the same size font and prominence as the original story.
B) An apology.
C) My reasonable out of pocket expenses in relation to this concerns notice and considering your offer of amends.
D) Due diligence in contacting other outlets that have copied and ran this “story” and advising them of the truth and your making of amends.
E) Fair, just and equitable financial compensation for damages.
Or in lieu of all of the above, an unbiased series of articles over a period time based upon myself and our “Ubuntu” community. These articles will present our view and position in regards to all of the matters raised in your article including our experiences and understanding on the current status of the child protection industry
in Australia.
I note that as this information is now on the internet it will never be able to be removed and compounds the damage I have suffered as a result of this untrue, unfair and defamatory publication.
I also note this false information has been republished on a number of Australian and overseas online publications and this even further compounds the damage I have suffered.
If no adequate offer of amends or no offer of amends at all is made within the statutory period I will without further notification file and serve a Statement of Claim for damages for defamation.
Paul Robert Burton.

Download (PDF, Unknown)

Unknown

 

 

20170814 Concerns Notice – The Australian

The following letter is my response to “The Australian” newspaper for their defamatory article about me last Friday.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/martin-place-tent-city-mayors-link-to-antimedicine-cult/news-story/92273327173f12a4ba9a0169758449d6

At a time when the Australian Government temporarily silences me and forces me to remove information depicting the truth about events that have happened to me completely out of my control. It appears fine for a major newspaper to spout absolute rubbish and publish defamatory articles filled with what Aussies call “Complete and Utter Bullshit !!!”

I look forward to their response and remind them to please not make the mistake of underestimating my capabilities where matters of truth and justice are concerned.

Much respect xxx PRB

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CONCERNS NOTICE
Defamation Act 2005
The Management,
News Corp Australia
2 Holt Street
Surry Hills
NSW Australia 2010
RE: Story in The Australian 10/08/17
“Sydney tent city mayor’s link to cult.”
Dear Sir/Madam,
On the 10/08/17 your paper “The Australian” ran an article that appeared online with the headline “Sydney tent city mayor’s link to cult”. That article referred to me and made statements that I consider highly defamatory. In point form I refer to the statements made and the imputations they carry.
1) I am referred to as the head of the Church of Ubuntu which is referred to as an “anti medicine cult” in the body of the story and as a “cult” in the headline. The imputation is that I am a cult leader who is dangerous and who exercises control over people with no concern for their wellbeing.
2) Secondly by putting the word Church in inverted commas and stating it is “influential” the imputation is carried that I exert control over people as a cult leader.
3) Thirdly, the imputation is carried, by linking the Church in the same sentence where it discusses Lanz Priestley as having assaulted women, that I somehow condone violence against women. This is outrageous as I do not and never have condoned violence against women. On the contrary, I dedicate my life to selfless service and in some cases this involves helping people struggling with the
shocking negative impacts of violent abuse. Further to this, I cannot speak for Lanz but what a disgusting thing to raise and certainly shows the lengths your paper goes to defame good people.
4) By stating “The parents later sought meal plans and treatment advice from the Church of Ubuntu and a deregistered doctor. The church claims the child, with serious medical conditions, has since been taken into the care of child protection authorities.” The imputation is carried that the child was NOT taken into the care of
child protection authorities and I am a person prone to making up lies when in fact the opposite is true and it is well known that the child was taken into the custody of Family And Community Services (FACS) NSW on the 19th May 2017.
5) By stating “Anti-vaccine proponent Andrew Katelaris is listed as Ubuntu’s “chief medical adviser”. He prepared “huge doses” of cannabis mixed with coconut oil and injected it directly into the ovarian cancers of two women at his Newcastle centre in
September, 2015. One woman later died.” The imputation is carried that I am somehow responsible for the death of a woman.
This again is clearly false in a number of ways. Firstly Dr Katelaris is not an “Antivaccine proponent” and secondly he is not listed as “chief medical advisor ” but as “an external consultant” with our wellness clinic. Thirdly, this incident has no direct connection to the Church and happened long before my involvement as Secretary
and Public Officer and not withstanding of course, the accusations towards Dr Andrew Katelaris were never raised by either of the woman he assisted, or their families.
6) By stating “The Church of Ubuntu did not respond to multiple requests for comment” I can only presume that you are referring to the one phone message I missed around 4pm Thursday 9/8/2017 because I was busy helping a family with a child custody issue.
I would also point out that in our constitution it clearly states
“To expound and support the values and teachings of all the recognised faiths.” We help the homeless, we help the sick, we help the disabled, the meek and the humble. We support people in need everywhere we are able. Much of this work is done for free, that is for no pecuniary reward of any kind. I do not indoctrinate or
coerce anyone, I personally do not receive any money for my work with the Church I am the secretary and public officer and a Minister, I exist on “dana”, donations gifted in kind for my selfless dedication to supporting people in need. We are not a “Cult”
I am very distressed at the story you ran about me directly and by mentioning my name and carrying my photo along with these imputations I believe both myself and our Ubuntu Community have been severely and unfairly defamed. Therefore I invite your organisation to make an offer of amends. Without prejudicing future legal actions, I suggest that any offer of amends must include,
A) A full retraction in the same size font and prominence as the original story.
B) An apology.
C) My reasonable out of pocket expenses in relation to this concerns notice and considering your offer of amends.
D) Due diligence in contacting other outlets that have copied and ran this “story” and advising them of the truth and your making of amends.
E) Fair, just and equitable financial compensation for damages.
Or in lieu of all of the above, an unbiased series of articles over a period time based upon myself and our Ubuntu Community. These articles will present our view and position in regards to all of the matters raised in your article including our experiences and understanding on the current status of the child protection industry
in Australia.
I note that as this information is now on the internet it will never be able to be removed and compounds the damage I have suffered as a result of this untrue, unfair and defamatory publication.
I also note this false information has been republished on a number of Australian and overseas online publications and this even further compounds the damage I have suffered.
If no adequate offer of amends or no offer of amends at all is made within the statutory period I will without further notification file and serve a Statement of Claim for damages for defamation.
Paul Robert Burton.

Download (PDF, Unknown)

2016-05-25 11_38_49-px